Comment by IAmBroom

2 days ago

See also: JK Rowling.

Pre-2018: Inclusion! Weirdos are people too! The marginalized need a voice!

Post-2019: Transsexuals are a blight on society! They cause cancer in puppies!

Sadly I suspect many people aren’t really driven by ideology as much as they wave around ideology when they think it gets them something they want.

Outside that… ideology is out the window.

This progressive movement is absolutely totalitarian.

As long as you adhere to all mainstream tenets, you're good and virtuous, like pre-2018 JK Rowling. Gay Dumbledore, yay!

But if the mainstream tenets change, and some previously loyal followers disagree with some of them, they should be ostracised, cancelled and vilified, like post-2019 JK Rowling.

The funny thing is that this is what real fascists and communists did to a T, yet, progressive people view themselves as anti-fascists.

  • Someone described it as Calvinball. The rules keep changing and if you don't keep up you're out. Meanwhile, the contradictions keep piling up...

  • No, this is just wrong. I remember someone explaining it to you in another thread but you chose to ignore it.

    • That's a curious way to introduce your point. I don't recall talking to someone about this on this site in the past few years, yet you act like you remembered my name and the arguments that were presented to me. Not very impressive. At least you could have repeated those explanations, and we'd have a substantial discussion instead of such petty rejection.

      (That being said, I do tend to ignore low-quality arguments, like the one you just made.)

Actually she's been very consistent in standing up for women's rights, which is what drives her to be critical of gender identity beliefs.

It's so weird.

She's still convinced that woman boxer is secretly trans.

Or how the primary concern TERFs like her have is that men will dress up as women to rape them in the women's room, instead of what they do now, which is rape women including in places that are women's rooms.

It's fascinating (in a horrid way) what they consider important.

It's also fascinating how the person who wrote "Fight Fascists as a teenager" thinks is really important we eliminate a tiny subset of people from the population.

  • Imane Khelif is male, and there are karotype tests and medical reports which prove it.

    The concern that "TERFs" have is women's rights being chipped away in favor of acquiescing to male demands.

  • Are you referring to Imane Khelif? The allegation is not that she is transgender, but that she is male. And based on what is publicly known now, this almost certainly true. JK Rowling was right.

    (There is a bit of confusion around this topic, due to how different groups use the term transgender. Gender activists generally use transgender to mean anyone who identifies as a different gender than the one assigned at birth; laypeople tend to use the term to mean any person who identifies as a different gender than their sex at birth. The difference matters in cases where a biological male is assigned female at birth [or vice versa], as is likely the case for Imane Khelif: in that case, gender activists would consider Khelif intersex but not transgender, since her gender identity as a woman matches her gender assigned at birth, despite the fact that she is biologically male.)

    To recap for those who have not been following along: Imane Khelif is an Algerian boxer who was assigned female at birth and raised as a girl. She was disqualified from the female division by the International Boxing Association (IBA) after failing two gender verification tests, performed in Turkey and India. The IBA has ties to Russia, and amidst sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) cut ties with the IBA, and no longer recognized their eligibility judgments. Since the IOC does not perform sex tests of their own, Khelif was allowed to compete and win gold in the women's division at the 2024 Olympics.

    The argument that the IBA was lying about the sex tests was always quite weak, since it's not clear what the motivation would be: Algeria has traditionally been an ally of Russia rather than the West.

    But the confirmation that the IBA was right came in 2025, when Imane Khelif refused to take the sex test required to participate in the 2025 world championships. Those were held in the UK and organized by World Boxing, an American organization that is also recognized by the IOC. They also required participants to undergo a sex test (specifically, a noninvasive PCR test to detect presence of the Y chromosone) performed either by the home country or the UK, so no corrupt Russians in the loop. If Khelif was in fact female, this would be the perfect opportunity for her to clear her name and prove to the world once and for all that she was not a male.

    Of course, the opposite happened. She refused to take the test, and instead filed a lawsuit, claiming that it was unfair that she was required to undergo sex testing (even though all women had to undergo the same simple PCR test) and demanding that she be allowed to participate without a sex test. Her appeal was denied.

    To any reasonable person this should prove with nigh-certainty that Khelif is male. Exactly as J.K. Rowling asserted based on the more limited evidence available in 2024.

    > It's fascinating (in a horrid way) what they consider important.

    It's fascinating (in a horrid way) how gender ideologues are willing to distort and deny reality. Truly Orwellian stuff.

    And as to importance: this cuts both ways. Why is it so important for gender activists to allow males with DSDs to compete against biological women?