Comment by arjie

1 day ago

You know there's a lot of he-said she-said here. The truth is that I was repeating there what they claimed in the paper which is that they intervened prior to merge to mainline.

My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.

  • IIRC one of them actually introduced a memory corrupting problem. I don't know if it got accepted or not. I remember seeing the issue and rejecting the patch for rhel.