Comment by yjftsjthsd-h
1 month ago
My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.
1 month ago
My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.
IIRC one of them actually introduced a memory corrupting problem. I don't know if it got accepted or not. I remember seeing the issue and rejecting the patch for rhel.
Man, what a mess.