Comment by yjftsjthsd-h
1 day ago
My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.
1 day ago
My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.
Man, what a mess.
IIRC one of them actually introduced a memory corrupting problem. I don't know if it got accepted or not. I remember seeing the issue and rejecting the patch for rhel.