Comment by steffan
7 hours ago
This is the equivalent of having the previous 50GB base plan and going over by $50 worth of data (an additional 50GB). If you were routinely going 50GB over the 50GB plan, I'd suggest that maybe a 50GB plan wasn't the right plan for you. Under the old plan, 100GB of data would have cost $100. Residential unlimited is $120, so for most users this would seem like an improvement.
The residential plan can't be used with the Starlink mini, only the full size Starlink. At least that's the case in the US. Cheapest plan is now $165 for users that need over 100GB.
I still think this is mostly a positive change, but it is a bummer that the service plans keep changing.
That's the thing, we don't regularly go over 50Gb. Probably won't go over 100Gb, either. But if we do, it's either slow speeds, or pay $165/month for unlimited roam every single month we use it, versus paying a little extra for the few times we go over.
> every single month we use it, versus paying a little extra for the few times we go over
I'm interpreting "every single month we use it" as every month you use starlink. In that case, you're incorrect. You can change plans when you hit the limit and then change back for the next month.
So instead of paying $1/GB extra every time you go above 50GB, you pay $115 extra every time you go above 100GB.
For most usage patterns, the second option is cheaper. And it sounds like your usage pattern is one of those.
(If I interpreted you wrong, and "every single month we use it" is supposed to mean the months you go over 100GB, then "every single month we use it" and "the few times we go over" mean exactly the same thing. Why word it with such different implications each time?)
So you're mad you're paying the same for double the data, of which it wasn't completely used beforehand anyway.
You do you, I guess.
My comment says nothing about being mad, nor that data go unused every month. But you do you and read it however you want, I guess.
2 replies →