Comment by juancn

18 hours ago

It feels like this would backfire.

I mean, UV light is carcinogenic, and environments that are way too clean, are fine for surgery or manufacturing semiconductors, but for most humans (specially children) they can be counter-productive.

The immune system needs something to train on and fight, otherwise you end up with autoimmune diseases and all sorts of crap.

We're essentially walking ecosystems that can easily be imbalanced.

Far UVC is not carcinogenic (most UV is, this is just a specific wavelength that isn't).

Ideally you'd want to use these lamps in environments that our immune systems didn't evolve for, like crowded conference rooms and school classrooms.

  • Far UVC is carcinogenic when it reaches living tissue. However, it has a very short mean free path so it doesn't, generally, reach the growing layer of skin. It's less obvious whether exposed mucus membranes (lips, nose, tongue) or the eyes are affected. It probably doesn't reach the lens of the eye, which is good.

The best training for immune robustness is going outside and get exposure to a wide range of stuff. But for indoor spaces, air quality is going to be dominated by the microbes and viruses of the people in the space itself. For public spaces and shared residential spaces with poor airflow this would be great - grocery stores, nursing homes, etc. For condos, apartments, SFH, etc. it's probably less necessary, but probably wouldn't hurt. Or nice to have when company comes over, or someone in the house is sick and "polluting" the air.

Not the same wavelength as UV. This wavelength is blocked by your skin - and outer layer of your eyeballs!