Comment by joe_mamba
9 hours ago
>What you listed for the past 10 years in Belgium is an average week in Chicago.
Wait a second friend, first you claim "basically no crime, no guns", then when confronted with the facts, instead of taking accountability and correcting, you move the goalposts to some high-crime US city.
I'm sure Brussels is super safe if you use Mogadishu as the point of comparisons, but if we were to keep the discussion in good faith and stick to comparisons with EU cities, my eastern european city has literally zero crime and guns making Belgium look like a warzone by comparison.
We have literally zero people killed by suicide explosives, guns or machetes compared to Brussels. How can people look at those crimes and go like "yeah, it's not so bad, you only have a relatively small chance of being killed" ?
> Wait a second friend, first you claim "basically no crime, no guns", then when confronted with the facts, instead of taking accountability and correcting, you move the goalposts to some high-crime US city.
OP is right, if those are the worst things to happen in the past 12 years, that's effectively 0 crime.
Especially when you consider that so much of what you listed were actually terrorists attacks conducted by an organization that hasn't conducted a foreign terror attack since winning control of their own territory from foreign occupiers.
>OP is right, if those are the worst things to happen in the past 12 years, that's effectively 0 crime.
If that's "zero crime" from your frame of reference, then what are the cities that have actual zero crime? -1000 crime? NaN?
I'd also be curious to know, if for example you or a family member would have been a victim in one of those violent incidents that don't happen in other EU cities, if you'd still have considered it "zero crime".
Is it one of those cases that when people see so much violent crime it's just a statistic that they had waive it easily? Because I can't.
As a passerby, I'm honestly not sure what pedantic hill you think you're dying on.
Basically no crime was pretty obvious.
1 reply →
I meant compared to the US it has basically no crime. Total gun incidents in the US is 10x more than Belgium.
And yes obviously there are guns in Belgian society but with no guns I was referring to how regular people don't walk around with guns. If you play football and your ball enters someone yard you don't have to worry about getting shot.
These days in the US you need to worry about getting disappeared by a parallel police force.
> I'm sure Brussels is super safe if you use Mogadishu as the point of comparisons
I believe their point was that Brussels is “super safe” compared to Chicago. 67 times fewer gun incidents is quite a lot.
I live in Dublin, Ireland, which is a lot smaller than Brussels, and when there is a shooting it gets on the news. You can imagine how amused I was coming from São Paulo that a full-on gang war was going on when I arrived here and 4 people had been shot in the previous year.
A friend of mine who also came from São Paulo, a trauma surgeon, had to change specialty here because there simply isn’t enough work.
Like I argumented before, comparisons with random high crime cities across the pond are in bad faith, which is why i proposed sticking only to EU cities to make the comparison fair, and Brussels does fairly bad at that level.
If you insist to go this route, you can definitely find cities even in the US with less violent crime than Brussels.
Why is comparing major cities in the US on a thread about someone leaving the US for Brussels bad faith?
3 replies →
Do you think Chicago is an outlier compared to other large cities in the US? Would you like to provide a comparison including other large cities?