"It’s a testament to their persistence that they’re managed to keep this up for over 10 years, and I for one will be buying Denis/Masha/whoever a well deserved cup of coffee."
Revealing publicly available information (actually publicly available, in the sense of "any person can easily look this up", not "publicly available" in a sense of "publicly available in leaked databases", which actual doxxers use as an excuse for their actions) isn't doxxing.
I never would have read the article had archive.today not gone into a CAPTCHA loop on me and then I see in developer tools it's pinging this other site. Talk about Streisand effect.
"It’s a testament to their persistence that they’re managed to keep this up for over 10 years, and I for one will be buying Denis/Masha/whoever a well deserved cup of coffee."
https://gyrovague.com/2023/08/05/archive-today-on-the-trail-...
And one where the author's cool with whoever is running archive.today.
> And one where the author's cool with whoever is running archive.today.
I don't think it really matters how "cool" you are with someone while actively trying to doxx them.
Revealing publicly available information (actually publicly available, in the sense of "any person can easily look this up", not "publicly available" in a sense of "publicly available in leaked databases", which actual doxxers use as an excuse for their actions) isn't doxxing.
3 replies →
I never would have read the article had archive.today not gone into a CAPTCHA loop on me and then I see in developer tools it's pinging this other site. Talk about Streisand effect.
I think Streisand effect is the goal. Look at the username of TFA poster and the name of the person the article author suspects.