I am indeed the guy in the article. My side of the story is fairly boring, didn't do crime but got blamed for it anyway by desperate cops. The whole investigation has been bizarre, for example, no-one has ever searched my homes, or even attempted to seize my personal devices.
Should find out within the next couple of months if the appeals court decides to acquit.
You're the guy in the article? Could you elaborate and share more of your side of the story?
I am indeed the guy in the article. My side of the story is fairly boring, didn't do crime but got blamed for it anyway by desperate cops. The whole investigation has been bizarre, for example, no-one has ever searched my homes, or even attempted to seize my personal devices.
Should find out within the next couple of months if the appeals court decides to acquit.
Wow. That's why I love HN. :)
1 reply →
But you were strongly linked to the crime. Thus your opsec is terrible.
1 reply →
This is worse than the SBF denial, do better, post a full on substack about how they didn't link you to a bitcoin address.
A LLM chatbot trained to deliver and debate the denials might be more on trend?
Your position is that none of your banking information was linked to this investigation?
1 reply →