Comment by leptons

1 month ago

$28 billion is definitely "a cash cow", no matter how many other "cash cows" they have.

My original comment:

> The fact is that Windows isn't the cash cow it used to be for Microsoft

My second to you:

> Windows isn't a cash cow it once was

You really need to learn how to read or all you are doing is arguing about semantics.

  • Yeah, you're still just wrong.

    In the 1990s Windows brought in $1.2 billion. In the 2010s, it brought in about $14 billion. In 2022 it was $24.8 billion, and in 2024, it was $29.1 billion.

    So your assumption that Windows is somehow "not the cash cow it once was" is false. It's bringing in more money than it ever did before.

    Windows definitely is still very much a "cash cow" for Microsoft. And they can have more than one "cash cow", they can have as many as they want and it wouldn't make Windows any less of a "cash cow".

    • > Yeah, you're still just wrong.

      No. All you are doing is engaging in semantic wankery.

      > So your assumption that Windows is somehow "not the cash cow it once was" is false. It's bringing in more money than it ever did before.

      What don't you understand about being a smaller percentage of their business as a whole?

      My entire point that it has gone from the basically a 30% (~2010) of the revenue to less than 10%. Therefore they are simply not going to care about it as much, because their strategy is basically to push as much as possible into the cloud.

      Saying they make more money with that now, when the growth compared to other parts of the business is low is missing the point.

      5 replies →