Comment by JumpCrisscross 19 days ago I hate the concept. But this is not the right case to test the tool against. 10 comments JumpCrisscross Reply nobody9999 19 days ago >I hate the concept. But this is not the right case to test the tool against.To which case are you referring? TFA doesn't appear to refer to any ongoing litigation associated with the "Tangles" software.Or are you referring to warrantless geo-fence tracking as a poor use case for the software? JumpCrisscross 19 days ago > which case are you referring?The example given at the top of the article. We want Tangle or whatever used idiotically to strike down its use in federal court. nilamo 19 days ago Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything. nobody9999 19 days ago >Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.Agreed. Which is why I submitted this in the first place. But AFAICT, it's orthogonal to GP's comment. Or not. Which is why I asked for clarification. asdff 19 days ago Transit and traffic planners would be foaming at the mouth for real commute data like this instead of just fixed point count data. 4 replies →
nobody9999 19 days ago >I hate the concept. But this is not the right case to test the tool against.To which case are you referring? TFA doesn't appear to refer to any ongoing litigation associated with the "Tangles" software.Or are you referring to warrantless geo-fence tracking as a poor use case for the software? JumpCrisscross 19 days ago > which case are you referring?The example given at the top of the article. We want Tangle or whatever used idiotically to strike down its use in federal court. nilamo 19 days ago Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything. nobody9999 19 days ago >Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.Agreed. Which is why I submitted this in the first place. But AFAICT, it's orthogonal to GP's comment. Or not. Which is why I asked for clarification. asdff 19 days ago Transit and traffic planners would be foaming at the mouth for real commute data like this instead of just fixed point count data. 4 replies →
JumpCrisscross 19 days ago > which case are you referring?The example given at the top of the article. We want Tangle or whatever used idiotically to strike down its use in federal court.
nilamo 19 days ago Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything. nobody9999 19 days ago >Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.Agreed. Which is why I submitted this in the first place. But AFAICT, it's orthogonal to GP's comment. Or not. Which is why I asked for clarification. asdff 19 days ago Transit and traffic planners would be foaming at the mouth for real commute data like this instead of just fixed point count data. 4 replies →
nobody9999 19 days ago >Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.Agreed. Which is why I submitted this in the first place. But AFAICT, it's orthogonal to GP's comment. Or not. Which is why I asked for clarification.
asdff 19 days ago Transit and traffic planners would be foaming at the mouth for real commute data like this instead of just fixed point count data. 4 replies →
>I hate the concept. But this is not the right case to test the tool against.
To which case are you referring? TFA doesn't appear to refer to any ongoing litigation associated with the "Tangles" software.
Or are you referring to warrantless geo-fence tracking as a poor use case for the software?
> which case are you referring?
The example given at the top of the article. We want Tangle or whatever used idiotically to strike down its use in federal court.
Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.
>Tracking the population without cause is never the right use case for anything.
Agreed. Which is why I submitted this in the first place. But AFAICT, it's orthogonal to GP's comment. Or not. Which is why I asked for clarification.
Transit and traffic planners would be foaming at the mouth for real commute data like this instead of just fixed point count data.
4 replies →