← Back to context Comment by elnatro 6 hours ago Not have to do it in the first place because of automated controls and fail-safes? 4 comments elnatro Reply embedding-shape 5 hours ago Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it? elnatro 5 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. 1718627440 4 minutes ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism. embedding-shape 5 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.
embedding-shape 5 hours ago Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it? elnatro 5 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. 1718627440 4 minutes ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism. embedding-shape 5 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.
elnatro 5 hours ago Not having fail-safes is the issue itself. 1718627440 4 minutes ago The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism. embedding-shape 5 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.
embedding-shape 5 hours ago So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.
Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it?
Not having fail-safes is the issue itself.
The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.
So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.