Comment by hmottestad

13 hours ago

I tried the iPad with Nano Texture and didn’t really like the rainbow effect that shows up on white brackgrounds. So I ended up returning it.

A while later I had an idea to mount an iPad to my fridge so that I could check the weather, add things to my shopping list, play music, etc. I bought the rather expensive iPad with Nano Texture screen and it has been amazing to use. There is a big window opposite the fridge, and without the nano texture the glare from behind makes it hard to read what’s on the screen.

Not sure I would enjoy nano texture on my MacBook. For outdoor use I found that Vivid is great to turn up the brightness using the extended range of HDR that Apple doesn’t otherwise allow me to use.

6 comments

hmottestad

Reply
ChrisMarshallNY  7 hours ago

I would think Nano on an iPad would be a problem.

IPads are sort of the Platonic Ideal of the type of environment that he says is an issue. Fingerprints, chaotic environment, etc.

  • hmottestad  3 hours ago

    Mine is mounted to the fridge, so it's not seeing as much use as it otherwise would. Screen does get smudges and they are more noticeable compared to the regular iPad screen. Not so much that it's a problem to be honest. I wipe it down every few weeks, and that's fine with me.

0xWTF  10 hours ago

I definitely enjoy the nanotexture on my MacBook. I didn't know they had it on iPads now and I'm due for a new iPad. Hmmm....

layer8  13 hours ago

What's annoying is that the bezel is still glossy. Bright reflections moving across it tend to be distracting.

  • ebbi  9 hours ago

    Apparently they leave it glossy so that it doesn't impact the camera quality. I remember reading this somewhere but can't confirm the source sorry.