Comment by hu3 19 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32976978 6 comments hu3 Reply benrutter 19 days ago Not the prettiest but absolutely amazing to use! I'm sure web devs are laughing at me right now, but I genuinely didn't realise websites with that many images etc could actually be that fast. diordiderot 19 days ago I would recommend comparing tohttps://next-faster.vercel.app/NextFaster feels faster than McMaster IMHO hu3 19 days ago Can't agree. That website is much simpler. Just a static list of images and text.There's no complex, dynamic filter. And no special rendering per type of item.It's a glorified tumbler since the only dynamic part looks like the shopping cart. Everything else is pre-rendered from what I saw in code.For static content like that I would have used Astro which is the golden standard. jwxz 19 days ago ~$500 for hosting that site feels insane to me [0]. I feel like a single $10 VPS could handle that load.[0] https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#... another_twist 17 days ago The extra 490 saved isnt worth the optimization. headache
benrutter 19 days ago Not the prettiest but absolutely amazing to use! I'm sure web devs are laughing at me right now, but I genuinely didn't realise websites with that many images etc could actually be that fast.
diordiderot 19 days ago I would recommend comparing tohttps://next-faster.vercel.app/NextFaster feels faster than McMaster IMHO hu3 19 days ago Can't agree. That website is much simpler. Just a static list of images and text.There's no complex, dynamic filter. And no special rendering per type of item.It's a glorified tumbler since the only dynamic part looks like the shopping cart. Everything else is pre-rendered from what I saw in code.For static content like that I would have used Astro which is the golden standard. jwxz 19 days ago ~$500 for hosting that site feels insane to me [0]. I feel like a single $10 VPS could handle that load.[0] https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#... another_twist 17 days ago The extra 490 saved isnt worth the optimization. headache
hu3 19 days ago Can't agree. That website is much simpler. Just a static list of images and text.There's no complex, dynamic filter. And no special rendering per type of item.It's a glorified tumbler since the only dynamic part looks like the shopping cart. Everything else is pre-rendered from what I saw in code.For static content like that I would have used Astro which is the golden standard.
jwxz 19 days ago ~$500 for hosting that site feels insane to me [0]. I feel like a single $10 VPS could handle that load.[0] https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#... another_twist 17 days ago The extra 490 saved isnt worth the optimization. headache
Not the prettiest but absolutely amazing to use! I'm sure web devs are laughing at me right now, but I genuinely didn't realise websites with that many images etc could actually be that fast.
I would recommend comparing to
https://next-faster.vercel.app/
NextFaster feels faster than McMaster IMHO
Can't agree. That website is much simpler. Just a static list of images and text.
There's no complex, dynamic filter. And no special rendering per type of item.
It's a glorified tumbler since the only dynamic part looks like the shopping cart. Everything else is pre-rendered from what I saw in code.
For static content like that I would have used Astro which is the golden standard.
~$500 for hosting that site feels insane to me [0]. I feel like a single $10 VPS could handle that load.
[0] https://github.com/ethanniser/NextFaster?tab=readme-ov-file#...
The extra 490 saved isnt worth the optimization. headache