Comment by gritzko 19 days ago I meant specifically revision control. JetBrains' school of thought is very much AST-centric, yes. 4 comments gritzko Reply mike_hearn 19 days ago I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging. gritzko 19 days ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 19 days ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different 1 reply →
mike_hearn 19 days ago I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging. gritzko 19 days ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 19 days ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different 1 reply →
gritzko 19 days ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 19 days ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different 1 reply →
mike_hearn 19 days ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different 1 reply →
I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging.
Great. But MPS is not a revision control system.
Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different
1 reply →