← Back to context Comment by gritzko 4 hours ago I meant specifically revision control. JetBrains' school of thought is very much AST-centric, yes. 3 comments gritzko Reply mike_hearn 2 hours ago I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging. gritzko 1 hour ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 1 hour ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different
mike_hearn 2 hours ago I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging. gritzko 1 hour ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 1 hour ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different
gritzko 1 hour ago Great. But MPS is not a revision control system. mike_hearn 1 hour ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different
mike_hearn 1 hour ago Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different
I think MPS stores projects as serialized ASTs and can do VCS merging.
Great. But MPS is not a revision control system.
Ah I see. You mean they were trying to build a custom VCS that had special support for AST merging. MPS uses regular git with custom merge drivers to do AST-level merging instead of textual merging, but that's a bit different