Comment by rockskon 18 days ago 95% of what is posted on the Internet is placed with intent to harm?What? 4 comments rockskon Reply asdfaslkj353 18 days ago If you consider Advertisement and News (with understanding that it is rarely unbiased) harmful, the 95% is not that far off the truth. rockskon 14 days ago And you think their internet was to harm?I'd argue the overwhelming majority was agnostic at best to harm being a factor. maest 18 days ago Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support. froggit 18 days ago > Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.And adults.
asdfaslkj353 18 days ago If you consider Advertisement and News (with understanding that it is rarely unbiased) harmful, the 95% is not that far off the truth. rockskon 14 days ago And you think their internet was to harm?I'd argue the overwhelming majority was agnostic at best to harm being a factor. maest 18 days ago Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support. froggit 18 days ago > Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.And adults.
rockskon 14 days ago And you think their internet was to harm?I'd argue the overwhelming majority was agnostic at best to harm being a factor.
maest 18 days ago Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support. froggit 18 days ago > Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.And adults.
If you consider Advertisement and News (with understanding that it is rarely unbiased) harmful, the 95% is not that far off the truth.
And you think their internet was to harm?
I'd argue the overwhelming majority was agnostic at best to harm being a factor.
Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.
> Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.
And adults.