Comment by stouset
19 days ago
No, the amount of water conserved through these measures was absolutely meaningless even at scale. You are talking about a fraction of a fraction of a percent of use.
19 days ago
No, the amount of water conserved through these measures was absolutely meaningless even at scale. You are talking about a fraction of a fraction of a percent of use.
Yeah. Farmers measure water use in acre-feet and assess flows at thousands of gallons per minute range.
The food in your plate consumes far more water than a glass of water. If anything, more water and less food eaten would be a good water conservation measure.
> So, more likely, 2 or 3 glasses of water :-)