Comment by fooker 13 hours ago > it's still a strict upgrade over AVX2If you benchmark it, it will be slower about half the time. 2 comments fooker Reply adgjlsfhk1 8 hours ago for the simplest cases it will be about the same speed as avx2, but if you're trying to do anything fancy, the extra registers and instructions are a godsend. fooker 1 hour ago Well, try it out for a realistic program.It makes for nice looking code, yes. But is often slower (for various reasons that are well understood by now).
adgjlsfhk1 8 hours ago for the simplest cases it will be about the same speed as avx2, but if you're trying to do anything fancy, the extra registers and instructions are a godsend. fooker 1 hour ago Well, try it out for a realistic program.It makes for nice looking code, yes. But is often slower (for various reasons that are well understood by now).
fooker 1 hour ago Well, try it out for a realistic program.It makes for nice looking code, yes. But is often slower (for various reasons that are well understood by now).
for the simplest cases it will be about the same speed as avx2, but if you're trying to do anything fancy, the extra registers and instructions are a godsend.
Well, try it out for a realistic program.
It makes for nice looking code, yes. But is often slower (for various reasons that are well understood by now).