If you wanted to attack peer review you should've attacked peer review, not entire science. And if "muh science" was some kind of code for peer review then it's not my fault that you are awful at articulating your point. It's still not clear what the hell do you mean.
I'm a feyerabend sympathizer, but even he wouldn't have gone this far.
He was against establishment dogma, not pro-anti intellectualism.
Yes, it only led to all advancements in the history of humanity, what a joke!
I am sure all advancements in the history of humanity was properly peer reviewed!
Including coca cola and Linux!
If you wanted to attack peer review you should've attacked peer review, not entire science. And if "muh science" was some kind of code for peer review then it's not my fault that you are awful at articulating your point. It's still not clear what the hell do you mean.
1 reply →
[flagged]
[flagged]