Comment by spiffyk
1 month ago
I would expect such a feature to use end-to-end encryption for the data, so that only the user can see the credentials. It does, right? Right?
1 month ago
I would expect such a feature to use end-to-end encryption for the data, so that only the user can see the credentials. It does, right? Right?
>>multi-account sync and scheduled sending
>I would expect such a feature to use end-to-end encryption for the data
How would "end-to-end encryption" when such features by definition require the server to have access to the credentials to perform the required operations? If by "end to end" you actually mean it's encrypted all the way to the server, that's just "encryption in transit".
> If by "end to end" you actually mean it's encrypted all the way to the server, that's just "encryption in transit".
This is what Zoom claimed was e2ee for a little while before getting in trouble for it.
This is what Google also claims as end to end encrypted in their Gmail end to end thing. Many people including me mentioned this in the comments.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45458482
Its entirely their end to their end encrypted. You don't get any privacy.
1 reply →