Comment by jaynamburi
1 month ago
Docker started as a simple, opinionated UX around Linux containers and became a product company wrapping an ecosystem that moved on without it.
The original breakthrough wasn’t containers themselves (LXC already existed), but the combination of: a reproducible image format, layered filesystem semantics, a simple CLI, and a registry model that made distribution trivial. That unlocked a whole workflow shift.
What happened next is that Docker the company tried to own the platform, while the industry standardized around the parts that mattered. The runtime split into containerd/runc, orchestration moved to Kubernetes, image specs went to OCI, and “Docker” became more of a developer UX brand than a core infrastructure primitive.
Today Docker mostly means:
A local dev environment (Docker Desktop)
A build UX (Dockerfile, buildx)
A compatibility layer over containerd
A commercial product with licensing constraints
Meanwhile, production container infrastructure largely bypasses Docker entirely.
That’s not failure it’s a common arc. Docker succeeded so well that it got standardized out of the critical path. What remains is a polished on ramp for developers, not the foundation of the container ecosystem.
In other words: Docker won the mindshare, lost the control, and pivoted to selling convenience.
All of the comments posted by the HN account named jaynamburi were written using an AI. Gemini confirms this: "Based on an analysis of the comments on the profile you linked, it is highly likely that they are written by an AI (or a human heavily using an LLM to generate responses)."