Comment by dismalaf

This attitude is cancer to OSS. The social aspect of OSS isn't required from anyone. Maintainers don't owe anyone a thing. The ability to fork and have your own source with the right to use as you wish is literally the defining feature of OSS, otherwise it's just shareware.

But hey, it's telling that the author places stewardship and branding before functionality when talking about reasons to fork.

> Don’t like how it’s run? Do something different. Don’t like the branding? Change it. Got a better idea? Implement it.