I don't understand why you are trying to defend through debate tactics the morality of shooting someone down on their knees while 4-6 agents of the State pile on top.
Does it really matter what rhetorical mechanism someone tries to use for this defence?
I don't understand why you are trying to defend through debate tactics the morality of shooting someone down on their knees while 4-6 agents of the State pile on top.
Does it really matter what rhetorical mechanism someone tries to use for this defence?
Surely you mean moving the goalposts?