Comment by readthenotes1 12 hours ago Alter other people's property.Agreed, that is a dangerous concept 3 comments readthenotes1 Reply direwolf20 9 hours ago *in ways that don't harm that person browsingonly 7 hours ago Not all harm is physical. bigstrat2003 9 hours ago Nonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.
direwolf20 9 hours ago *in ways that don't harm that person browsingonly 7 hours ago Not all harm is physical. bigstrat2003 9 hours ago Nonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.
bigstrat2003 9 hours ago Nonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.
*in ways that don't harm that person
Not all harm is physical.
Nonsense. The owner almost certainly doesn't want someone's "art" to adorn his wall, and will then have to pay to restore the wall to its desired condition. That is material harm done to the building owner.