Comment by tynanpurdy 23 days ago if they decided to, sure they could. they don't want to and never will. 2 comments tynanpurdy Reply manuelmoreale 23 days ago I am not debating that. But this same reasoning applies to @at or any other implementation. You have to be willing to implement the features and use the protocol. So I still don’t see why this is any different. verdverm 22 days ago You keep asking questions, rejecting answers, and then saying you don't understand.Perhaps it is time to read more about the protocol directly instead of asking questions on HN to poke holes in it from a position of ignorance.
manuelmoreale 23 days ago I am not debating that. But this same reasoning applies to @at or any other implementation. You have to be willing to implement the features and use the protocol. So I still don’t see why this is any different. verdverm 22 days ago You keep asking questions, rejecting answers, and then saying you don't understand.Perhaps it is time to read more about the protocol directly instead of asking questions on HN to poke holes in it from a position of ignorance.
verdverm 22 days ago You keep asking questions, rejecting answers, and then saying you don't understand.Perhaps it is time to read more about the protocol directly instead of asking questions on HN to poke holes in it from a position of ignorance.
I am not debating that. But this same reasoning applies to @at or any other implementation. You have to be willing to implement the features and use the protocol. So I still don’t see why this is any different.
You keep asking questions, rejecting answers, and then saying you don't understand.
Perhaps it is time to read more about the protocol directly instead of asking questions on HN to poke holes in it from a position of ignorance.