Comment by postalcoder

8 hours ago

Very unfortunately named. OpenAI probably (and likely correctly) estimated that 13 years is enough time after the Snowden leaks to use "prism" for a product but, for me, the word is permanently tainted.

Anecdotally, I have mentioned PRISM to several non-techie friends over the years and none of them knew what I was talking about, they know 'Snowden' but not 'PRISM'. The amount of people who actually cared about the Snowden leaks is practically a rounding error

  • Most people don't care about the details. Neither does the media. I've seen national scandals that the media pushed one way disproven during discovery in a legal trial. People only remember headlines, the retractions are never re-published or remembered.

  • Given current events, I think you’ll find many more people care in 2026 than did in 2024.

    (See also: today’s WhatsApp whistleblower lawsuit.)

Guessing that Ai came up with the name based on the description of the product.

Perhaps, like the original PRISM programme, behind the door is a massive data harvesting operation.

This was my first thought as well. Prism is a cool name, but I'd never ever use it for a technical product after those leaks, ever.

I'd think that most people in science would associate the name with an optical prism. A single large political event can't override an everyday physical phenomenon in my head.

Surprised they didn't do something trendy like Prizm or OpenPrism while keeping it closed source code.

I followed the Snowden stuff fairly closely and forgot, so I bet they didn't think about it at all and if they did they didn't care and that was surely the right call.