← Back to context

Comment by postalcoder

6 hours ago

Very unfortunately named. OpenAI probably (and likely correctly) estimated that 13 years is enough time after the Snowden leaks to use "prism" for a product but, for me, the word is permanently tainted.

Anecdotally, I have mentioned PRISM to several non-techie friends over the years and none of them knew what I was talking about, they know 'Snowden' but not 'PRISM'. The amount of people who actually cared about the Snowden leaks is practically a rounding error

  • Most people don't care about the details. Neither does the media. I've seen national scandals that the media pushed one way disproven during discovery in a legal trial. People only remember headlines, the retractions are never re-published or remembered.

  • Given current events, I think you’ll find many more people care in 2026 than did in 2024.

    (See also: today’s WhatsApp whistleblower lawsuit.)

This was my first thought as well. Prism is a cool name, but I'd never ever use it for a technical product after those leaks, ever.

Guessing that Ai came up with the name based on the description of the product.

Perhaps, like the original PRISM programme, behind the door is a massive data harvesting operation.

I'd think that most people in science would associate the name with an optical prism. A single large political event can't override an everyday physical phenomenon in my head.

Surprised they didn't do something trendy like Prizm or OpenPrism while keeping it closed source code.

I followed the Snowden stuff fairly closely and forgot, so I bet they didn't think about it at all and if they did they didn't care and that was surely the right call.