Comment by noitpmeder 5 hours ago This sounds like a net negative for the end user 4 comments noitpmeder Reply MomsAVoxell 4 hours ago Not if the end user is an operator of safety critical equipment, such as rail or pro audio or any of a number of industries where stability and reproducibility is essential to the product. direwolf20 2 hours ago That's because it is a net negative to the end user and to society at large. warkdarrior 4 hours ago If the end users do not want the net negative, maybe they should pay for the security features instead of expecting everything for free. direwolf20 2 hours ago I don't understand. The user will not have a choice.
MomsAVoxell 4 hours ago Not if the end user is an operator of safety critical equipment, such as rail or pro audio or any of a number of industries where stability and reproducibility is essential to the product.
warkdarrior 4 hours ago If the end users do not want the net negative, maybe they should pay for the security features instead of expecting everything for free. direwolf20 2 hours ago I don't understand. The user will not have a choice.
Not if the end user is an operator of safety critical equipment, such as rail or pro audio or any of a number of industries where stability and reproducibility is essential to the product.
That's because it is a net negative to the end user and to society at large.
If the end users do not want the net negative, maybe they should pay for the security features instead of expecting everything for free.
I don't understand. The user will not have a choice.