Comment by abustamam

> LLM-generated code has no theory; you either need to supervise it closely enough to impose your own, or treat it as disposable.

Agreed! And I think that's what I'm getting at. Adding what they're now calling "skills," or writing your own, is becoming crucial to LLM-assisted development. If the LLM is writing too much slop, then there probably wasn't sufficient guidance to ensure that slop wouldn't be written.

The first step of course is to actually check that the generated code is indeed slop, which is where many people miss the mark.