I don't see much of a reason to keep a copy of node_modules on the git repository considering they can be reinstalled for deployments and it is generally bad form.
sndrec (the author):
Thank you for this - I'm newbie at webdev so I wasn't sure what was and wasn't needed. I'll merge this soon.
Author claims this was made in 5 days on twitter. Nobody knew about this project until they released it and their inital commit contains 200,000 lines of code. Curious
Pull Request: chore: remove node_modules
I don't see much of a reason to keep a copy of node_modules on the git repository considering they can be reinstalled for deployments and it is generally bad form.
sndrec (the author):
Thank you for this - I'm newbie at webdev so I wasn't sure what was and wasn't needed. I'll merge this soon.
Haha, almost certainly Claude
counterpoint:
- The readme is two lines and has six words, one of which is a typo.
- Claude would never commit a node_modules folder unless coerced.
It’s disrespectful to casually call things AI-generated. I wish people would do it less unless they have 1) proof and 2) a meaningful reason for it.
I went through a bunch of the commits and didn't see a single comment.
That definitely seems human to me.
Author claims this was made in 5 days on twitter. Nobody knew about this project until they released it and their inital commit contains 200,000 lines of code. Curious
1 reply →
But... it doesn't use React, so how?
Adding this to my pile of ten million nickels, thanks
If anything, it seems that the author used GPT 5.2 (-codex) in Codex, which is actually far more capable at such work than Opus 4.5 in Claude Code.
Can you tell from the pixels?
no it f*ckin rocks. Don't mistake me for a claude hater. I just know my boy's handiwork
Guess that's why it doesn't work on mobile then :)
4 replies →