Comment by dTal 11 days ago Rule of law? Innocent people are being shot. 11 comments dTal Reply account42 11 days ago Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process. JumpCrisscross 11 days ago > They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the processPretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.) zahlman 11 days ago [flagged] mexicocitinluez 11 days ago > calling them "innocent" is quite dishonestYou're not actually arguing that American citizens shouldn't be able to film the cops are you? That would be pretty un-American. zahlman 11 days ago [flagged] 3 replies → maxehmookau 11 days ago Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest. kdkirsch 11 days ago So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast. zahlman 11 days ago That is not at all the argument being made.
account42 11 days ago Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process. JumpCrisscross 11 days ago > They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the processPretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.) zahlman 11 days ago [flagged] mexicocitinluez 11 days ago > calling them "innocent" is quite dishonestYou're not actually arguing that American citizens shouldn't be able to film the cops are you? That would be pretty un-American. zahlman 11 days ago [flagged] 3 replies → maxehmookau 11 days ago Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest. kdkirsch 11 days ago So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast. zahlman 11 days ago That is not at all the argument being made.
JumpCrisscross 11 days ago > They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the processPretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.) zahlman 11 days ago [flagged]
mexicocitinluez 11 days ago > calling them "innocent" is quite dishonestYou're not actually arguing that American citizens shouldn't be able to film the cops are you? That would be pretty un-American. zahlman 11 days ago [flagged] 3 replies →
maxehmookau 11 days ago Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest.
kdkirsch 11 days ago So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast. zahlman 11 days ago That is not at all the argument being made.
Wile I don't think they deserved to loose their lives over it, calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest. They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process.
> They were at the very least intentionally being a nuisance and in most cases breaking actual laws in the process
Pretti was breaking zero laws. You’d have to do some prosecutorial voodoo to conjure up a misdemeanor.
There is lawbreaking in that videos. But the felony-level stuff is all from folks in uniform. (Which, thankfully, they’ve started wearing.)
[flagged]
> calling them "innocent" is quite dishonest
You're not actually arguing that American citizens shouldn't be able to film the cops are you? That would be pretty un-American.
[flagged]
3 replies →
Being a nuisance is not illegal. In the eyes of the law, someone being a nuisance is, indeed, innocent - and to say so is not dishonest.
So now being a nuisance is justification for summary extrajudicial executions?! If people on HN believe this then we’re toast.
That is not at all the argument being made.