Comment by mikehotel 19 hours ago Addon to mitmproxy: https://docs.mitmproxy.org/stable/addons/overview/ 4 comments mikehotel Reply Retr0id 16 hours ago Looks like it's implemented that way already?https://github.com/jmuncor/sherlock/blob/fb76605fabbda351828... jmuncor 13 hours ago Yes... Got it patched up and fixed some security issues it had. Let me know what you think of the new version. jmuncor 18 hours ago What would you think of simply using an http relay for all providers? Would that make you feel better secutity wise? also could extend the tool to change the context you are sending and make it more granular to what you want/need...
Retr0id 16 hours ago Looks like it's implemented that way already?https://github.com/jmuncor/sherlock/blob/fb76605fabbda351828... jmuncor 13 hours ago Yes... Got it patched up and fixed some security issues it had. Let me know what you think of the new version.
jmuncor 13 hours ago Yes... Got it patched up and fixed some security issues it had. Let me know what you think of the new version.
jmuncor 18 hours ago What would you think of simply using an http relay for all providers? Would that make you feel better secutity wise? also could extend the tool to change the context you are sending and make it more granular to what you want/need...
Looks like it's implemented that way already?
https://github.com/jmuncor/sherlock/blob/fb76605fabbda351828...
Yes... Got it patched up and fixed some security issues it had. Let me know what you think of the new version.
What would you think of simply using an http relay for all providers? Would that make you feel better secutity wise? also could extend the tool to change the context you are sending and make it more granular to what you want/need...