Comment by gjvc 9 hours ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46511599 similar reasoning 3 comments gjvc Reply richrichardsson 8 hours ago I honestly didn't mean it like that, but I can understand that it comes across that way.A better wording would be "what advantage does this have over premake which is also Lua based". nottorp 6 hours ago Tbh, why does it matter what it's written in? Does it do the job? MobiusHorizons 4 hours ago Lua is the syntax in the build configuration file, not how the tool is implemented internally. It’s part of the developer experience.
richrichardsson 8 hours ago I honestly didn't mean it like that, but I can understand that it comes across that way.A better wording would be "what advantage does this have over premake which is also Lua based". nottorp 6 hours ago Tbh, why does it matter what it's written in? Does it do the job? MobiusHorizons 4 hours ago Lua is the syntax in the build configuration file, not how the tool is implemented internally. It’s part of the developer experience.
nottorp 6 hours ago Tbh, why does it matter what it's written in? Does it do the job? MobiusHorizons 4 hours ago Lua is the syntax in the build configuration file, not how the tool is implemented internally. It’s part of the developer experience.
MobiusHorizons 4 hours ago Lua is the syntax in the build configuration file, not how the tool is implemented internally. It’s part of the developer experience.
I honestly didn't mean it like that, but I can understand that it comes across that way.
A better wording would be "what advantage does this have over premake which is also Lua based".
Tbh, why does it matter what it's written in? Does it do the job?
Lua is the syntax in the build configuration file, not how the tool is implemented internally. It’s part of the developer experience.