Comment by simianwords 2 hours ago how would you prove that a human has it? 2 comments simianwords Reply usefulcat 2 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. simianwords 12 minutes ago its not whataboutism, i'm simply asking how you would perform the same test for a human. then we can see if it applies or not to chatgpt?
usefulcat 2 hours ago Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.ETA:To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer. simianwords 12 minutes ago its not whataboutism, i'm simply asking how you would perform the same test for a human. then we can see if it applies or not to chatgpt?
simianwords 12 minutes ago its not whataboutism, i'm simply asking how you would perform the same test for a human. then we can see if it applies or not to chatgpt?
Whataboutism is almost never a compelling argument, and this case is no exception.
ETA:
To elaborate a bit: based on your response, it seems like you don't think my question is a valid one.
If you don't think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know why not.
If you do think it's a valid question, I'm curious to know your answer.
its not whataboutism, i'm simply asking how you would perform the same test for a human. then we can see if it applies or not to chatgpt?