Comment by tonyedgecombe 10 days ago It's much harder to prove the non-existence of something than the existence. 4 comments tonyedgecombe Reply ChrisGreenHeur 10 days ago Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent. mrbombastic 10 days ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 10 days ago what argument? pjaoko 9 days ago The question wasn't about which is harder, it was asking for proof.
ChrisGreenHeur 10 days ago Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent. mrbombastic 10 days ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 10 days ago what argument?
mrbombastic 10 days ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 10 days ago what argument?
Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent.
I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence.
what argument?
The question wasn't about which is harder, it was asking for proof.