← Back to context Comment by tonyedgecombe 7 hours ago It's much harder to prove the non-existence of something than the existence. 3 comments tonyedgecombe Reply ChrisGreenHeur 6 hours ago Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent. mrbombastic 3 hours ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 3 hours ago what argument?
ChrisGreenHeur 6 hours ago Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent. mrbombastic 3 hours ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 3 hours ago what argument?
mrbombastic 3 hours ago I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence. ChrisGreenHeur 3 hours ago what argument?
Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent.
I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence.
what argument?