Comment by rolymath

5 hours ago

With all due respect, if you run this and you get hacked, you deserve it.

Why? What's wrong with it?

  • Let's ignore all the potential security issues in the code itself and just think about it conceptually.

    By default, this system has full access to your computer. On the project's frontpage, it says, "Read and write files, run shell commands, execute scripts. Full access or sandboxed—your choice." Many people run it without a sandbox because that is the default mode and the primary way it can be useful.

    People then use it to do things like read email, e.g., to summarize new email and send them a notification. So they run the email content through an LLM that has full control over their setup.

    LLMs don't distinguish between commands and content. This means there is no functional distinction between the user giving the LLM a command, and the LLM reading an email message.

    This means that if you use this setup, I can email you and tell the LLM to do anything I want on your system. You've just provided anyone that can email you full remote access to your computer.

  • It's a vibecoded project that gives an agent full access to your system that will potentially be used by non technically proficient people. What could go wrong?