Comment by necovek 23 days ago Or they do, and two sentences from two different experiences don't tell a full story? 6 comments necovek Reply MichaelZuo 23 days ago Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero… necovek 23 days ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 23 days ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
MichaelZuo 23 days ago Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero… necovek 23 days ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 23 days ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
necovek 23 days ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 23 days ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
MichaelZuo 23 days ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?
Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…
I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.
So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?
That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?
3 replies →