← Back to context Comment by necovek 1 month ago Or they do, and two sentences from two different experiences don't tell a full story? 6 comments necovek Reply MichaelZuo 1 month ago Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero… necovek 1 month ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 1 month ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
MichaelZuo 1 month ago Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero… necovek 1 month ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 1 month ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
necovek 1 month ago I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything. MichaelZuo 1 month ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
MichaelZuo 1 month ago So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things? 3 replies →
Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?
Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…
I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.
So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?
That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?
3 replies →