Comment by cf100clunk 2 days ago I don't see how this relates to removing SysVinit support from LFS. Choice is good. 4 comments cf100clunk Reply reppap 2 days ago Are you entitled to the LFS developers time? They build the system they get to make into what they want. preisschild 2 days ago That "choice" still has to be maintained. And why spend effort when you can do the same things + more with systemd? cf100clunk 2 days ago Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit. PunchyHamster 2 days ago you can fork it and do it.But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal
reppap 2 days ago Are you entitled to the LFS developers time? They build the system they get to make into what they want.
preisschild 2 days ago That "choice" still has to be maintained. And why spend effort when you can do the same things + more with systemd? cf100clunk 2 days ago Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit. PunchyHamster 2 days ago you can fork it and do it.But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal
cf100clunk 2 days ago Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit. PunchyHamster 2 days ago you can fork it and do it.But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal
PunchyHamster 2 days ago you can fork it and do it.But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal
Are you entitled to the LFS developers time? They build the system they get to make into what they want.
That "choice" still has to be maintained. And why spend effort when you can do the same things + more with systemd?
Clearly there are lots of people who don't want something that does what you say systemd does. Bravo that choice is out there, but what a pity that LFS does not seem to have the resources to test future versions for SysVinit.
you can fork it and do it.
But frankly if goal is to learn people about how Linux works, having SysV there is opposite to that goal