Comment by xvokcarts 20 hours ago Why were you trying to dox the archive owner? 12 comments xvokcarts Reply jdiff 16 hours ago This is misrepresentative of the situation, and an unloaded version of the question being asked here is answered within the article itself. JasonADrury 10 hours ago How is it misrepresentative of the situation? protimewaster 8 hours ago Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article. 2 replies → philipwhiuk 16 hours ago Is it only doxxing if the organisation is digital only? Should we have no right to know who controls a large media organisation? mikkupikku 15 hours ago Whether you have a right to know, according to your personal value system, is orthogonal to whether it's doxing. otterley 14 hours ago Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to. 3 replies → vachina 15 hours ago This kills the organisation
jdiff 16 hours ago This is misrepresentative of the situation, and an unloaded version of the question being asked here is answered within the article itself. JasonADrury 10 hours ago How is it misrepresentative of the situation? protimewaster 8 hours ago Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article. 2 replies →
JasonADrury 10 hours ago How is it misrepresentative of the situation? protimewaster 8 hours ago Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article. 2 replies →
protimewaster 8 hours ago Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article. 2 replies →
philipwhiuk 16 hours ago Is it only doxxing if the organisation is digital only? Should we have no right to know who controls a large media organisation? mikkupikku 15 hours ago Whether you have a right to know, according to your personal value system, is orthogonal to whether it's doxing. otterley 14 hours ago Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to. 3 replies → vachina 15 hours ago This kills the organisation
mikkupikku 15 hours ago Whether you have a right to know, according to your personal value system, is orthogonal to whether it's doxing. otterley 14 hours ago Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to. 3 replies →
otterley 14 hours ago Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to. 3 replies →
This is misrepresentative of the situation, and an unloaded version of the question being asked here is answered within the article itself.
How is it misrepresentative of the situation?
Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article.
2 replies →
Is it only doxxing if the organisation is digital only? Should we have no right to know who controls a large media organisation?
Whether you have a right to know, according to your personal value system, is orthogonal to whether it's doxing.
Rights don’t emanate from one’s subjective personal beliefs. Sure, there are “natural rights” espoused by political philosophers, but in the real world, rights are enshrined in constitutions and codified in laws that we are all subject to.
3 replies →
This kills the organisation