Comment by jdiff

19 hours ago

This is misrepresentative of the situation, and an unloaded version of the question being asked here is answered within the article itself.

How is it misrepresentative of the situation?

  • Because none of the names are real and they were all already posted publicly previously. This is covered in the article.

    • We don't know that none of the names are real. And even if they aren't, the article is still showcasing his failed attempt at doxing the owner of archive.today and providing a starting point for anyone else wanting to try.

      > they were all already posted publicly previously

      Doxing very often consists of nothing more than collecting data from a bunch of public sources

      1 reply →