Comment by Syzygies 21 days ago He probably uses Phillips head screws. 5 comments Syzygies Reply highhedgehog 21 days ago wait, what is wrong with that? tim333 21 days ago Dunno but there are two similar but slightly different cross head screw designs https://www.pbswisstools.com/en/news/detail/phillips-and-poz... fuzzfactor 21 days ago Patents at work.Before the patent on Phillips screws & tools expired, Pozidriv was launched which was different enough to be capable of a bit more torque.Phillips was for mass-production, Posidriv for mass-production with a little more torque.Lots of people who wanted that still waited until the Pozidriv patent expired before considering it.The screws themselves are marked on the head with little ticks so you can tell the difference, but not necessarily the screwdrivers :\It's good to have the right tool for the job, HP instruments used Posidriv in a number of places. 1 reply →
highhedgehog 21 days ago wait, what is wrong with that? tim333 21 days ago Dunno but there are two similar but slightly different cross head screw designs https://www.pbswisstools.com/en/news/detail/phillips-and-poz... fuzzfactor 21 days ago Patents at work.Before the patent on Phillips screws & tools expired, Pozidriv was launched which was different enough to be capable of a bit more torque.Phillips was for mass-production, Posidriv for mass-production with a little more torque.Lots of people who wanted that still waited until the Pozidriv patent expired before considering it.The screws themselves are marked on the head with little ticks so you can tell the difference, but not necessarily the screwdrivers :\It's good to have the right tool for the job, HP instruments used Posidriv in a number of places. 1 reply →
tim333 21 days ago Dunno but there are two similar but slightly different cross head screw designs https://www.pbswisstools.com/en/news/detail/phillips-and-poz... fuzzfactor 21 days ago Patents at work.Before the patent on Phillips screws & tools expired, Pozidriv was launched which was different enough to be capable of a bit more torque.Phillips was for mass-production, Posidriv for mass-production with a little more torque.Lots of people who wanted that still waited until the Pozidriv patent expired before considering it.The screws themselves are marked on the head with little ticks so you can tell the difference, but not necessarily the screwdrivers :\It's good to have the right tool for the job, HP instruments used Posidriv in a number of places. 1 reply →
fuzzfactor 21 days ago Patents at work.Before the patent on Phillips screws & tools expired, Pozidriv was launched which was different enough to be capable of a bit more torque.Phillips was for mass-production, Posidriv for mass-production with a little more torque.Lots of people who wanted that still waited until the Pozidriv patent expired before considering it.The screws themselves are marked on the head with little ticks so you can tell the difference, but not necessarily the screwdrivers :\It's good to have the right tool for the job, HP instruments used Posidriv in a number of places. 1 reply →
wait, what is wrong with that?
Dunno but there are two similar but slightly different cross head screw designs https://www.pbswisstools.com/en/news/detail/phillips-and-poz...
Patents at work.
Before the patent on Phillips screws & tools expired, Pozidriv was launched which was different enough to be capable of a bit more torque.
Phillips was for mass-production, Posidriv for mass-production with a little more torque.
Lots of people who wanted that still waited until the Pozidriv patent expired before considering it.
The screws themselves are marked on the head with little ticks so you can tell the difference, but not necessarily the screwdrivers :\
It's good to have the right tool for the job, HP instruments used Posidriv in a number of places.
1 reply →