Comment by thatguy0900 15 days ago If we're assuming they didn't leave victims unredacted on purpose 4 comments thatguy0900 Reply streetfighter64 15 days ago Pretty devious tactic if so. Chilling effect on both any further witnesses and anybody interested in archiving the data (gives them an ethical conundrum at least). In addition to giving them (the feds) a convenient excuse to take down random docs. thatguy0900 15 days ago Not about a ethical conondrum when rehosting. Anyone who rehosts the whole files can be accused of hosting child porn and doxxing and taken down. direwolf20 14 days ago Very convenient for Epstein and his associates jeltz 14 days ago Looking at examples it looks way more like incompetence.
streetfighter64 15 days ago Pretty devious tactic if so. Chilling effect on both any further witnesses and anybody interested in archiving the data (gives them an ethical conundrum at least). In addition to giving them (the feds) a convenient excuse to take down random docs. thatguy0900 15 days ago Not about a ethical conondrum when rehosting. Anyone who rehosts the whole files can be accused of hosting child porn and doxxing and taken down. direwolf20 14 days ago Very convenient for Epstein and his associates
thatguy0900 15 days ago Not about a ethical conondrum when rehosting. Anyone who rehosts the whole files can be accused of hosting child porn and doxxing and taken down. direwolf20 14 days ago Very convenient for Epstein and his associates
Pretty devious tactic if so. Chilling effect on both any further witnesses and anybody interested in archiving the data (gives them an ethical conundrum at least). In addition to giving them (the feds) a convenient excuse to take down random docs.
Not about a ethical conondrum when rehosting. Anyone who rehosts the whole files can be accused of hosting child porn and doxxing and taken down.
Very convenient for Epstein and his associates
Looking at examples it looks way more like incompetence.