Comment by Yokohiii
19 days ago
That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP.
19 days ago
That's an odd opinion about a language with a lot of class related features. I can only assume you have a very strong definition of OOP.
OOP doesn't mean that your language has a "class" keyword, nor dot notation for calling functions.
I enjoyed the pragmatic historical definition of OOP given in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI where essential it can be seen as subtype polymorphism