Comment by kjs3 3 months ago And...that's bad? 3 comments kjs3 Reply freakynit 3 months ago Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted". d-us-vb 3 months ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 3 months ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
freakynit 3 months ago Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted". d-us-vb 3 months ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 3 months ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
d-us-vb 3 months ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 3 months ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
freakynit 3 months ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted".
It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet.
Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.