← Back to context Comment by kjs3 19 days ago And...that's bad? 3 comments kjs3 Reply freakynit 19 days ago Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted". d-us-vb 18 days ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 17 days ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
freakynit 19 days ago Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted". d-us-vb 18 days ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 17 days ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
d-us-vb 18 days ago It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet. freakynit 17 days ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
freakynit 17 days ago Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.
Not until you are wrongly considered "untrusted".
It is never wrong to be considered untrusted. It is only occasionally right to be considered trusted. Especially in zero-risk relationships that is the default on the anonymous internet.
Being considered neutral is different from being explicitly considered untrusted.