Comment by dec0dedab0de 12 days ago unless it doesn’t matter if it’s evesdropped 6 comments dec0dedab0de Reply FabHK 12 days ago Traffic could be tampered as well. nomel 12 days ago Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter. FabHK 11 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. 3 replies →
FabHK 12 days ago Traffic could be tampered as well. nomel 12 days ago Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter. FabHK 11 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. 3 replies →
nomel 12 days ago Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter. FabHK 11 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. 3 replies →
FabHK 11 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. 3 replies →
Traffic could be tampered as well.
Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter.
Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol.
3 replies →