Comment by FabHK 16 days ago Traffic could be tampered as well. 5 comments FabHK Reply nomel 16 days ago Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter. FabHK 15 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. nomel 14 days ago It literally is. I do not give a fuck if someone reads or fakes the wind speed from the sensor on my roof. 2 replies →
nomel 16 days ago Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter. FabHK 15 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. nomel 14 days ago It literally is. I do not give a fuck if someone reads or fakes the wind speed from the sensor on my roof. 2 replies →
FabHK 15 days ago Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol. nomel 14 days ago It literally is. I do not give a fuck if someone reads or fakes the wind speed from the sensor on my roof. 2 replies →
nomel 14 days ago It literally is. I do not give a fuck if someone reads or fakes the wind speed from the sensor on my roof. 2 replies →
Sometimes that doesn't matter either. That is the valid use case of a plain-text protocol like telnet: doesn't matter.
Sure. But, contrary to what some people seem to think, "it's nothing secret" is not a sufficient justification to use an unencrypted plain-text protocol.
It literally is. I do not give a fuck if someone reads or fakes the wind speed from the sensor on my roof.
2 replies →